<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikis not ideal for external customer collaboration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.groupswim.com/2008/05/12/wikis-not-ideal-for-external-customer-collaboration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.groupswim.com/2008/05/12/wikis-not-ideal-for-external-customer-collaboration/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Collaboration, Enterprise 2.0, and SaaS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:38:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Financial Tech: References</title>
		<link>http://blog.groupswim.com/2008/05/12/wikis-not-ideal-for-external-customer-collaboration/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>Financial Tech: References</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groupswim.wordpress.com/?p=60#comment-346</guid>
		<description>[...] retrieved date: 02/28/09 [11] “Wikis not ideal for external customer collaboration”, http://blog.groupswim.com/2008/05/12/wikis-not-ideal-for-external-customer-collaboration/, retrieved date: 03/03/09     page_revision: 3, last_edited: 1236632336&#124;%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z (%O ago) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] retrieved date: 02/28/09 [11] “Wikis not ideal for external customer collaboration”, <a href="http://blog.groupswim.com/2008/05/12/wikis-not-ideal-for-external-customer-collaboration/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.groupswim.com/2008/05/12/wikis-not-ideal-for-external-customer-collaboration/</a>, retrieved date: 03/03/09     page_revision: 3, last_edited: 1236632336|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z (%O ago) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marnix</title>
		<link>http://blog.groupswim.com/2008/05/12/wikis-not-ideal-for-external-customer-collaboration/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Marnix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 12:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groupswim.wordpress.com/?p=60#comment-97</guid>
		<description>I would use a wiki ONLY for the collaborative editing (group editing) of documents or web pages (manuals, agenda meetings, brain storm lists, ...).  Not &#039;... to distribute information on their company and/or product ...&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would use a wiki ONLY for the collaborative editing (group editing) of documents or web pages (manuals, agenda meetings, brain storm lists, &#8230;).  Not &#8216;&#8230; to distribute information on their company and/or product &#8230;&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Effective Collaboration</title>
		<link>http://blog.groupswim.com/2008/05/12/wikis-not-ideal-for-external-customer-collaboration/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Effective Collaboration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groupswim.wordpress.com/?p=60#comment-96</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Enterprise Collaboration and Virtual Teams Report (May 13, 2008)...&lt;/strong&gt;

The People Part of Enterprise Collaboration and Virtual Teams One vendor argues that wikis are bad for external customer collaboration, due to four reasons. &quot;I think many companies rolled out Wikis for their customers and incorrectly assumed they were...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Enterprise Collaboration and Virtual Teams Report (May 13, 2008)&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The People Part of Enterprise Collaboration and Virtual Teams One vendor argues that wikis are bad for external customer collaboration, due to four reasons. &#8220;I think many companies rolled out Wikis for their customers and incorrectly assumed they were&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
