<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is Free Worth?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.groupswim.com/2008/07/21/what-is-free-worth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.groupswim.com/2008/07/21/what-is-free-worth/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Collaboration, Enterprise 2.0, and SaaS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:38:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://blog.groupswim.com/2008/07/21/what-is-free-worth/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 04:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groupswim.wordpress.com/?p=137#comment-182</guid>
		<description>Nick,

Thanks for commenting.  I appreciate your thoughts.  However, I&#039;m not sure it is a wild exaggeration.  Many &quot;free&quot; services are costly in terms of attention, lack of enterprise features, uptime guarantees, etc..  My post is in the context of running a business.  As a consumer, I agree with you that the costs of free are perfectly fine.  However, if I&#039;m running a business (which we are), the costs of &quot;free&quot; are higher than we all think.  Hope this clarifies what I meant.  Thanks again for reading our blog and commenting.  Please continue.

Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick,</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting.  I appreciate your thoughts.  However, I&#8217;m not sure it is a wild exaggeration.  Many &#8220;free&#8221; services are costly in terms of attention, lack of enterprise features, uptime guarantees, etc..  My post is in the context of running a business.  As a consumer, I agree with you that the costs of free are perfectly fine.  However, if I&#8217;m running a business (which we are), the costs of &#8220;free&#8221; are higher than we all think.  Hope this clarifies what I meant.  Thanks again for reading our blog and commenting.  Please continue.</p>
<p>Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://blog.groupswim.com/2008/07/21/what-is-free-worth/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 21:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groupswim.wordpress.com/?p=137#comment-181</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s perfectly legitimate for GroupSwim to charge a fee, but this particular argument is a wild exaggeration. As a user of most of the above-mentioned &#039;free&#039; services I certainly don&#039;t consider the cost of being marketed at to be expensive. Like you, I ignore 99.9% of the marketing and, given this, I fail to see why it slows me down at all,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s perfectly legitimate for GroupSwim to charge a fee, but this particular argument is a wild exaggeration. As a user of most of the above-mentioned &#8216;free&#8217; services I certainly don&#8217;t consider the cost of being marketed at to be expensive. Like you, I ignore 99.9% of the marketing and, given this, I fail to see why it slows me down at all,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
