<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Collaboration Software Return on Investement (ROI)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.groupswim.com/2009/04/13/collaboration-software-return-on-investement-roi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.groupswim.com/2009/04/13/collaboration-software-return-on-investement-roi/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Collaboration, Enterprise 2.0, and SaaS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:38:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://blog.groupswim.com/2009/04/13/collaboration-software-return-on-investement-roi/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 22:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.groupswim.com/?p=654#comment-369</guid>
		<description>Hey Kathy,

Great comments.  I definitely like the approach of applying a probability and factoring that against the ROI calculation.  Appreciate the comment very much.

Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Kathy,</p>
<p>Great comments.  I definitely like the approach of applying a probability and factoring that against the ROI calculation.  Appreciate the comment very much.</p>
<p>Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kathy herrmann</title>
		<link>http://blog.groupswim.com/2009/04/13/collaboration-software-return-on-investement-roi/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>kathy herrmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.groupswim.com/?p=654#comment-368</guid>
		<description>Hi Jason, 

I think you&#039;re on the right track to determining the ROI.  The best approach to determining the ROI will combine all components relating to increased revenue potential and cost savings. To me, these would include:

* Professional time saved in collaboration (as you showed above) across all impacted employees (be sure to consider the costs, if applicable, of wasting time on the wrong document versions).
* Reduced IT costs (for hw &amp; sw infrastructure, salaries, &amp; other professional costs).
* Reduced Support costs (call and email volumes).
* New sales from building a collaborative culture.
* After-market sales from building a collaborative culture..

Specific to a solution like GroupSwim, also consider savings for 

* Reduced travel.  
* Sales improvements (for example, ensuring sales folks distributed up-to-date materials, have current price lists for quotes, etc).

Depending on the company, there may be other applicable ROI components to consider.

Additionally, I like to consider an ROI in terms of Minimum, Most Likely, and Maximum outcomes.  This is particularly useful when considering some of the harder to quantify components like increased sales.  For example, set the parameters for the Min case to have a 90% probability of occurring, Most Likely to have a 50% probability, and Max to have a 10% probability.  If you take that approach, then you can see a range of possibilities and better access the general opportunity and risk of the software solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jason, </p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re on the right track to determining the ROI.  The best approach to determining the ROI will combine all components relating to increased revenue potential and cost savings. To me, these would include:</p>
<p>* Professional time saved in collaboration (as you showed above) across all impacted employees (be sure to consider the costs, if applicable, of wasting time on the wrong document versions).<br />
* Reduced IT costs (for hw &amp; sw infrastructure, salaries, &amp; other professional costs).<br />
* Reduced Support costs (call and email volumes).<br />
* New sales from building a collaborative culture.<br />
* After-market sales from building a collaborative culture..</p>
<p>Specific to a solution like GroupSwim, also consider savings for </p>
<p>* Reduced travel.<br />
* Sales improvements (for example, ensuring sales folks distributed up-to-date materials, have current price lists for quotes, etc).</p>
<p>Depending on the company, there may be other applicable ROI components to consider.</p>
<p>Additionally, I like to consider an ROI in terms of Minimum, Most Likely, and Maximum outcomes.  This is particularly useful when considering some of the harder to quantify components like increased sales.  For example, set the parameters for the Min case to have a 90% probability of occurring, Most Likely to have a 50% probability, and Max to have a 10% probability.  If you take that approach, then you can see a range of possibilities and better access the general opportunity and risk of the software solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
