Posts Tagged ‘Web2.0’

Jott Move from Free to Premium – Bait and Switch or Good Business?

September 17, 2008

This is cross-posted with ReadWriteWeb where I will be occasionally writing on the Enterprise Channel.

Many Web 2.0 companies have either tried to make money on their product or wish they could. Jott is an example of one that took the plunge and moved to a paid model following a successful beta and “free” period. I spoke with Jott CEO John Pollard to learn how they did it and how it was going.

Jott is a great tool if you haven’t tried it. It is a voice-to-text service where you call a number on your phone, dictate a note, schedule a meeting, or write a to-do and the service transcribes your voice into the appropriate message type; it even creates an object on Outlook automatically. The service had been in “beta” status and completely free. Recently, they came out of beta and rolled out a paid model with multiple plans for different usage and features. Other sources have discussed the details of the service so I’ll leave it be. Jott still has free service, but put it together so if you are a frequent Jott user, you’ll be very tempted to upgrade. The upgrade itself is less than $4 so I suspect many people will go for it.  Jott has a variety of plans to choose from including free, basic, pro, pay-as-you-go, etc.

The company based these plans largely on user behavior and lots of data. When they started the company, they knew they would ultimately have a free and paid version, but had to learn the rest along the way. For example, they had to find out if their customers were home makers, road warriors, students, professionals, etc.. Some of the factors they experimented with during the beta program included turnaround times, length of recordings, and features. By collecting data around user behavior and usage, they were able to model scenarios and identify trends. They then used focus groups, the Jott user group, and conjoint analysis (a very cool survey technique requiring users to make trade-offs on product features versus price) to come up with the different packages. They were very confident that some professionals wouldn’t want an ad-supported service, and the research confirmed it.

As you can imagine, they overcame significant challenges along the way. While many users understand that Jott has to put food on the table, there were users who were shocked that a company dare ask for money. Personal note: this is both a common and ridiculous sentiment that has grown as more “free” things pelt us, but that is a conversation for another day. John and company decided to be extremely transparent about the process and spent significant time in their forums, hitting the blogs, and using other marketing mechanisms to tell their story and let users know what was going on. John admitted they could improve on the communication front, but did a solid job. The communication philosophy was tell the users what was coming, tell them when it comes and explain why, as many times in as many places as they could.

The company is very pleased with the conversion process so far. Jott is hitting their goals and is on plan. One pleasant surprise is the percentage of people selecting annual plans; John said they are getting 10 times the number annual subscribers that they expected. I’m not surprised as I’m sure a large percentage of Jott users are business customers, and this is the most efficient way to get something expensed; this is pure speculation on my part. John has good advice for other companies embarking on this journey. First, talk to your customers as much as possible. Really talk to them and understand the problem you are trying to solve and how they use the product or service. Second, utilize web-based tools like conjoint analysis to gather quantitative information to make decisions. Finally, try to be transparent and don’t surprise your customers; they hate that. If you build something that people want and value, you can ask them for money and it is good business.

Jott is example of Web 2.0 company trying to monetize

August 21, 2008

Jott is a great tool if you haven’t tried it out.  In a nutshell (I saw Austin Powers for the 100th time the other night), you call a number on your phone, dictate a note, schedule a meeting, or write a to do and the service transcribes your voice into the appropriate message type; it even creates an object on your Outlook automatically.  It has been free up until yesterday.

Other sources are discussing the particulars of the service so I’ll leave it be.  What I find interesting is this the first example that I can remember where a service that had been free is now not free; THEY ARE TRYING TO MONETIZE.  They have done a good job packaging their offerings.  They still have a free service, but have scoped it in such a way that if you use it a lot, you are going to be very tempted to upgrade.  The upgrade itself is less than $5 so I suspect many people will just do it.  Personally, I’m not traveling much right now so I’ll hold off, but I could see doing it in a heartbeat if I were using it more.  Since I mostly commute by bike, it is tough to use the phone.  It is must though if you are a car commuter.

It will be very interesting how this plays out as there are so many services like Jott who were free and remain free (Xobni and others come to mind).  It is a great service and adds value so I think they should charge for it.  I’m glad they have the balls to give it a try.  I wouldn’t be surprised if they end up juggling the different offerings over time, but they will learn as they go.  My hat is off to them and wish them luck.

What is Free Worth?

July 21, 2008

I’ve had several users try GroupSwim but decide against going too far in a trial because they knew they eventually would have to pay for the service.  I know there are many “free” services that we all use.  Personally, I use the following “free” services/software:

  • Search
  • Google Reader
  • Yahoo home page
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn (although we pay for an upgrade on this one)
  • Viddler (hosting videos for GroupSwim)

There are a handful of others but you get the idea.  However, these services are not “free”.  For the right to use them, I get to use a site cluttered with ads or they sell my information to make money.  This is an important point – companies “HAVE” to make money.  Unless they are supported through charity (or opensource which is essentially volunteerism), they must have revenue to exist and prosper.  Companies also have costs, which many of us fail to consider.  For example, software design, bandwidth, storage, hardware upgrades, etc. all represent legitimate costs software companies incur.  Steven Hodson on Mashable wrote a great post about how “free” things cost money and that expectations have become separated from reality.

So, if we all agree that services are not free, but you don’t pay for them, what are you giving them in return?  What does it cost you?

  1. The opportunity to market to you.  Whether you explicitly realize or agree to it, all the services I list above and many more are constantly marketing to you.  I ignore 99.9% of it, but it is there
  2. Your attention.  If you are using free stuff, it is taking your time.  It also takes you longer to do things on free sites because there are advertising and marketing barriers or gates you must pass through to use the service.  This takes time that you aren’t using for something else

If I’m looking at something for my business, these two “costs” are VERY expensive.  I would not want my employees or customers to waste time or be distracted for a minute much less the hours many of these services “cost”.  Paying a small fee in return for using a useful, value added service makes a ton of sense to me.

I learned a term in business school called TANSTAnAFL (there ain’t no such thing as a free lunch).  In spite of many businesses being created, grown, acquired, and funded, this principle still holds true.  My good friend Tom brought up the other tenet that holds true 100% of the time, which is “you get what you pay for.”  I’m simply amazed at the pervasiveness of people and companies that think this doesn’t apply to them and that stuff like GroupSwim should be free. At the end of the day (2 to 3 years from now), many of these companies that are “free” will be gone.  “Free” is not a sustainable strategy.